The man who says Kevin Hart falsely implicated him in a sex tape extortion plot and then failed to “publicly exonerate” him as promised in a settlement agreement can no longer pursue his $12 million breach of contract lawsuit against Hart in open court, at least for now, a judge has ruled.

In a decision signed Thursday, Los Angeles County Judge Daniel S. Murphy ruled that plaintiff Jonathan “JT” Jackson forfeited his right to sue Hart in a public forum when he added a clause to their settlement that agreed to private arbitration.

Jackson had appeared in court Wednesday with his lawyer, Daniel Reback, to argue that the ratification of the entire settlement, including the arbitration clause, was contingent upon Hart publicly exonerating Jackson of any extortion related to Hart’s highly publicized 2017 sex tape scandal. According to Jackson, Hart promised to post a lengthy, “meticulously negotiated” statement on social media as a precursor to their agreement to “resolve all issues” without any “monetary compensation.” Reback said the contingency was outlined in a clause that he underlined for emphasis in the final settlement signed in August 2021.

“Mr. Jackson insisted to me that the agreement have a [special] clause where if Mr. Hart did not perform verbatim the words that we negotiated, that all promises by Mr. Jackson are rendered null and void, including this promise to arbitrate,” Reback argued in court Wednesday. The lawyer also claimed Jackson was fraudulently induced into signing the contract. He repeated the allegation that Hart sent a “fabricated email” to the Los Angeles County District Attorney to falsely implicate Jackson in an extortion crime. In a filing on Oct. 10, Reback claimed the email submission “was likely calculated to take the heat off Hart for having a sex tape video of his extramarital affair.” He said “labeling JT an extortionist would distract the public. But it also would ruin JT’s life.” (Hart’s lawyer did not respond to a request for comment on the claim about the allegedly fabricated email.)

“This was an agreement to arbitrate any disputes, and this is a dispute, and it belongs in arbitration,” Hart’s lawyer, Donte Mills, told the judge in court Wednesday. “Clearly the plaintiff in this matter is set on trying to embarrass my client and file anything they can come up with that’s derogatory.”

“None of plaintiff’s arguments invalidate the arbitration clause itself,” Judge Murphy wrote in his ruling. “The case is stayed in its entirety pending the outcome of arbitration.”

Jackson filed his underlying breach of contract lawsuit in July. He confirmed he joined Hart on the August 2017 trip to Vegas where a video of Hart in bed with a model was recorded in Hart’s hotel room, but he was adamant he did not extort Hart. (Portions of the sex tape were published on the now-defunct website Fameolous.com but later taken down.) 

Jackson was arrested in April 2018 on suspicion he extorted Hart. The charges were ultimately dropped. According to Jackson, Hart concocted the fake email that demanded 20 bitcoins to prevent the release of more of the recording. Jackson claims Hart “instigated” the theory to prosecutors that Jackson was behind the extortion. He also claimed the comedian harmed him again when he released a Netflix docuseries in 2019 that doubled down on the extortion claim even after the extortion charges were dropped. Jackson claimed Hart later reached out to avoid a threatened defamation lawsuit and agreed to deliver the highly negotiated and scripted Instagram video statement.

By Nancy Dillon: October 25, 2024:Rolling Stone